On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 02:36:18PM -0500, Robert Story wrote: > > grrr... >
I consider it good - it increases the portability of the code. > Ugh... ugly ugly... I agree, on the other hand that applies to the original code as well - if you feel gracious then maybe one ugly could be dropped but that still leaves one. > I just checked in a better fix, with no casting required. Interesting, I look forward to seeing it (sometime tomorrow or so, public CVS) > Now I just have to figure out what to do in the older releases, where I'm not > supposed to be changing structures. This suggests you did change some structure for your patch - well, I'll have to wait. /MF ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
