>>>>> On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 15:40:15 +0000, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> While we are at discussing 5.1.x, how are we going to deal with >> the "Coverity bugs" and 5.1.x (and 5.0.x)? Dave> My gut reaction is to say that the Coverity bugs should be Dave> considered w.r.t 5.2.x and above. The 5.1.x and 5.0.x lines Dave> are basically being closed down - fixing lots of (?minor) Dave> bugs doesn't really seem worth it. I agree. I've saved them in a directory "just in case" but I haven't been applying them there because that would basically make the 5.1 cycle start over from scratch due to the number of patches involved. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
