On 23/08/06, Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem with shipping of the HAVE_s is that they reflect the state on > the build machine as opposed to the install machine and in those days of > package managers the build and install machine often do differ.
Good point. > This leads to the next problem - a package using net-snmp might get confused > since net-snmp-config.h defines a HAVE_ that configure left undefined since > that package isn't installed on the machine. > > I think we should move all the HAVE_s to a separate config file that isn't > installed so that only macros named NETSNMP_* are present in net-snmp-config.h I'd suggest that at the very least, we should move the HAVE_s to a separate config file. Whether that file should be installed or included by default is a slightly different question. I'm concerned we might get bogged down in discussing that, and fail to make a start on actually doing anything at all. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
