Wes Hardaker wrote: > I'm *not* proposing that we use the newer autoconf features in older > branch configure.in files. I'm proposing that we build the configure > that gets released with the newest.
Sounds reasonable, but unfortunately there's a AC_FUNC_GETMNTENT() bug in autoconf 2.61 that breaks our build unless a trivial workaround is applied to the source. See Debian bugs http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403243 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403079 for details. For the moment I'll be adding the workaround to MAIN to facilitate the update to autoconf 2.61 there. There's also the datarootdir problem when upgrading autoconf: http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.unix.net-snmp-coders/browse_thread/thread/83954dbd7d771655/fda81537da568e08 so I'm not sure yet what to do with the branches. +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
