Dave Shield wrote:
> On 24/01/07, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Have you actually *double-checked* whether all of these scripts work
>> fine with basic Bourne shell on (early) *nix systems?
> 
> No.
> 
>>                    I don't think it'd
>> be beneficial to prefer '#!/bin/sh' over '#!/usr/bin/env bash' if there
>> are systems where the first isn't working and the latter is.
> 
> However I *have* run into problems running these scripts on
> systems where bash isn't installed at all.
> (or possibly where "env" isn't installed in /usr/bin - I can't
> immediately recall the details).

It's hard to discuss details without the details. ;-)

Unless you can come up with some more arguments, I'd prefer to back out
the change at least for the nsb* scripts. While the nsb* scripts
probably *could* be made to work with generic /bin/sh, I don't think
they do as-is.


+Thomas

-- 
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to