>>>>> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> However, I would suggest that the 'tags' and 'branches' DS> trees contain a large amount of stuff that is redundant and/or DS> confusing. Responding generically because they apply equally to both branches, tags, etc: 1) I'm all for cleaning up things and moving them to specialized directories (though I'd possibly use "historic" instead of "old"). 2) I'm really really really strongly objecting to the out-right removal of a given tag or branch. They are a huge part of the projects history and there is zero gain from removing them, but potential gain for keeping them so I don't even understand the proposal unless I'm missing something. I *do* look through older code sometimes and do diffs against versions and frequently try to find what releases a particular code version was in, or... Actually, the one cvs command that I've never been able to figure a replacement for in svn (though I have 15 years of cvs experience, I only have about 2 of svn so that's probably half the problem): cvs status -v file In cvs this lists all the branches and tags that a file is a member of. I used to use this fairly frequently in CVS... I haven't found a SVN replacement yet (though I haven't even done a google search to see if there is one). -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
