>>>>> "RS" == Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

RS> Which is why I still think 5.4.1 should bump current and
RS> not just age.

You do realize we did right?

svn diff -r 15624 Makefile.top
Index: Makefile.top
===================================================================
--- Makefile.top        (.../trunk/net-snmp/Makefile.top)       (revision 15624)
+++ Makefile.top        (.../branches/V5-4-patches/net-snmp/Makefile.top)      
(working copy)
[SNIP OTHER PART]
@@ -74,8 +75,8 @@
 # 5.3 was at 10, 5.4 is at 15, ...  This leaves some room for needed
 # changes for past releases if absolutely necessary.
 #
-LIBCURRENT  = 15
-LIBAGE      = 0
+LIBCURRENT  = 16
+LIBAGE      = 1
 LIBREVISION = 0

 LIB_LD_CMD      = $(LIBTOOL) --mode=link $(LINKCC) $(CFLAGS) -rpath $(libdir) 
-version-info $(LIBCURRENT):$(LIBREVISION):$(LIBAGE) -o
[SNIP OTHER OTHER PART]

RS> Which is their problem. If they don't like it, they could complain to the
RS> operating system vendor about not providing compat libraries. Or they could
RS> bypass the whole issue and link statically.

I've also seen OS vendors be tempted to remove our changes to the
current/age/revision numbers too ;-)  Haven't seen one actually commit
to that yet, but I haven't checked either.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to