On ons, 2007-09-26 at 17:09 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: > >>>>> "CA" == Chris Abbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > CA> Just curious if anyone has started to look at or think about making > CA> snmptrap and snmptrapd IPv6 aware? If not I'll be starting looking > CA> at it shortly, just didn't want to duplicate effort. > > I believe it should already? > > Ok, I was all set to say that it should...
So was I. Now I tested it and sees that it has an unfortunate bad habit of warning when it fails to look up an address, and failing that is quite normal. > but I agree I don't think it does. Could you please elaborate? What do you think is missing? > Whack away and send patches! /MF ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
