Magnus Fromreide wrote: > Could you please try again using net-snmp r16714 or higher and tell if > that is how you wanted it to work?
I'll be on holiday the first half of next week, but will attempt to try that out as soon as I get back. Looking at the code in that commit, I think this will work quite well, thanks! (p.s. I think the bug number in the commit log is a typo, I don't see anything related to bug 1801835 in this commit.) -- 6OB/7T -=- LTC Embedded Linux -=- Customer Architect and Cat Herder The value of Open Standards is only evident to Open Minds. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
