On ons, 2008-05-28 at 12:50 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: > >>>>> On Sun, 25 May 2008 07:16:23 +0200, Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL > >>>>> PROTECTED]> said: > > MF> I would like to start changing all the const u_char*'s used to accept > MF> arbitrary pointers into const void*'s. > > Can we bring this up at the next meeting to discuss it?
That is fine with me. > Or at least get enough people here to say it's a good thing? Say a > vote of +3 or so? That would be OK as well but the response til now seems rather underwhelming :-) In fact I think it would be good to discuss it at the next meeting. > I actually don't have a problem with it (I thought I would!). The only > thing I'd be concerned about is if compilers spit out warnings for > people using old code. This is one of the rare cases where backwards > compatibility might actually be better, not worse, with the patch in > place. The only thing that would potentially break is a non 8-bit byte > machine, but since we don't support those anyway, who cares? /MF ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
