On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:18 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:33:00 +0200, Magnus Fromreide > >>>>> <[email protected]> said: > > >> You mean like: > > Whoops. Ha. > > MF> But that one affects the logs on line 917 and 934 (of snmp_agent.c). > > MF> I am talking about the log on line 831 which is controlled by the global > MF> variable log_addresses which is enabled by the -a option to snmpd or by > MF> NETSNMP_DS_AGENT_VERBOSE which in turn is set by either of -d or -V. > > So, it sounds like the end of all of this discussion is: there is > nothing to change?
That depends. If it is as you say and this is related to tcpWrappers then why is it unconditionally included in the agent regardless of the inclusion of the tcpWrappers code? If it is an independent logging then I think it is odd that we only log the first read from each host. As for history the predecessor of this code is in r2 (in snmpd.c) so I suppose the commit logs that hopefully explained the ideas behind it are lost. I still think it is an awful amount of code for a very limited purpose. /MF ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
