On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 00:50:04 -0500
Robert Story <rst...@freesnmp.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:13:29 -0800 Stephen wrote:
> SH> > I suspect you're putting clientaddr in snmpd.conf instead of snmp.conf. 
> If you
> SH> > want to do that, you have to prefix it for it to be recognized as a 
> snmp.conf
> SH> > token.. e.g.
> SH> > 
> SH> >  [snmp] clientaddr 192.168.1.99
> SH> > 
> SH> > If that's not the case, further debugging is needed...
> SH> 
> SH> I put it in snmp.conf. It is a bug, see the patch. Please apply.
> 
> I see the patch. It allows clientaddr to be in snmpd.conf without the [snmp]
> prefix. But clientaddr is a snmp token, and does work in snmpd.conf when
> properly prefixed.

Have you tried putting address (source address) in snmp.conf and
generating a trap. It didn't work with 5.4.2.1.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to