On 22 March 2010 18:46, Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> wrote: > How well have these patches been tested, and on which platforms ?
The first three were in response to queries on the mailing list. I've tested (2) and (3) myself (on Fedora), and received positive feedback from the original posters. (4) has also been tested on my Fedora setup (1) is based on a back-port of fixes from the 5.5.x branch Unfortunately I don't have multi-Terabyte disks myself > * (1) will only work when sizeof(long) > sizeof(int). But what would be the effect if long (and int) are both 32-bit? My understanding is that the comparison (long_ret > MAX_INT_32) would never match, so the latched value wouldn't be assigned. Hence the result returned would be the same as before. > * (4) breaks the Windows build because netsnmp_get_mib_directory() is not > exported from the Net-SNMP DLL on the 5.4 branch (see also > http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/net-snmp?view=rev&revision=18347). OK. What if: a) 'netsnmp_get_mib_directory' was added to win32/libsnmp_dll/libsnmp.def ? or b) The update to snmp/agent.c was omitted? (i.e. just issue the message when "module not found" errors are printed) Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
