On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:55:47 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> On 26 March 2010 15:27, Robert Story <[email protected]> wrote: DS> > This is a call for votes on delaying the current pending releases until a DS> > protocol bug can be fixed. I don't have a patch, but I think a protocol bug DS> > should be a show stopper. DS> [...] DS> However I'd be reluctant to hold the full releases up for too long. DS> This has been a problem for many many years, but hasn't triggered DS> a large volume of complains. So although it's technically incorrect, DS> it clearly hasn't been a major problem in practise.
Yeah, I figured this would be the most likely response. DS> Do you have any feel for whether a full fix is likely to be DS> reasonably imminent? Probably not, because I doubt anyone is actively looking into it. Part of the reason for the cfv was to see if it motivated anyone to look into the v3 case. Maybe we can get it fixed for 5.6... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
