On 24 May 2010 05:11, Omer Zak <w...@zak.co.il> wrote: > 2. Is anyone else in favor of forking the Net-SNMP project over the > comments issue?
If you wish to fork off a separate project based on the current Net-SNMP code - you are, of course, perfectly free to do so. In many ways, I would welcome such a move - the use of this project (and the consequent volume of support requests) has long grown past the point where the current volunteer team can hope to provide an adequate level of support. It is some time since I've felt able to ensure that every email request receives an adequate answer (and I know that Wes gave up several years before I did). The prospect of moving this burden onto another project is extremely appealing! However, I do feel that you are over-reacting somewhat. I don't know whether you have had a chance to read my response to Doug. But the particular incident in question was more an issue of not _duplicating_ comments, rather than dropping them because they weren't formatted just right. Of course we convert //-style comments to /**/ form where necessary. I can't believe you think we would be so petty as to do anything else! Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
