On 23 August 2010 21:34, Robert Story <rst...@freesnmp.com> wrote: > do you think a CFV is needed for changes to non-default test scripts? i.e. > scripts that won't be run unless explicitly requested by the user?
Probably not, no. Changes to test scripts (and to mib2c templates) feel to lie somewhere in between code changes (which require a +3 vote) and documentation changes (which don't). I'm inclined to treat these in a similar to inline-documentation tweaks, i.e. only suitable if there's another RC candidate planned, but not requiring an explicit vote. Alternatively, it might be sensible for such intermediate level changes to require a +1 vote. So in practice it should be sufficient to flag the change on the mailing list, with no dissenting voices. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
