On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:34:55 +0200 Magnus wrote:
MF> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 01:15:21AM -0400, Robert Story wrote:
MF> > test for EVP_sha224/EVP_sha384 functions in openssl/evp.h instead of
MF> > hardcoding lack of them per os, since any os could have an old openssl lib
MF> > without support for these functions.
MF> 
MF> -1, since net-snmp-config.h.in seems to be regenerated with the wrong 
version
MF> of autoheader.

Ok, I'll make sure it gets updated to the correct version.

MF> Also, why do you use AC_CHECK_DECL instead of AC_CHECK_FUNC, is there a risk
MF> that the functions are macros?

Hadn't done autoconf hackery lately, so check decl was the first thing that
came to mind. But I'm pretty sure that these can not be macros, as they are
function pointers that are passed to other openssl functions.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users 
worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and 
speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to