Wes Hardaker wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:38:56 +0100, Dave Shield >>>>>> <[email protected]> said: > DS> But it does make it doubly important to have a solid review of rc2 > DS> on a wide range of O/S's (Since it's now incumbant on *every* system > DS> with a suitable OpenSSL setup to detect these routines successfully, > DS> rather than simply skipping the calls on known affected > DS> environments) > > I agree, it affects a lot of platforms and should be tested "if > possible". We still need a build farm...
As you know, I usually take care of that to some extent. Unfortunately, the new test infrastructure (testing/RUNFULLTESTS) doesn't really work with the dist/nsb* scripts yet (which I am using). Consequently, we know a lot less about the multi-platform "make test" status than for past releases/branches (5.5.x and earlier). Hopefully me (or someone else) will find the time to update dist/nsb*. +Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
