On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 22:35 +0200, Niels Baggesen wrote: > Den 29-09-2010 18:02, Wes Hardaker skrev: > > I agree... the issue is that the current symbol being checked for in > > the if statement doesn't match the symbol that is actually being set > > previously. > > Yes, and the (frightening) result is that --enable-ipv6 is silently > ignored. I could fear that this means that IPv6 has not been compiled on > the BSD platforms for quite some time. (I don't have a BSD system handy > any more, but I assume that they use use this generic branch)
I do have access to a Solaris 10 system, with the patch I get IPv6, without it I don't... Without patch: checking ipv6 stack type... "unknown, no" checking for platform-specific source... checking for and configuring transport modules to use... Alias UDP TCP Callback Unix UDPIPv4Base UDPBase IPv4Base SocketBase TCPBase. With patch: checking ipv6 stack type... "generic, yes, using libc" checking for platform-specific source... checking for and configuring transport modules to use... Alias TCPIPv6 UDPIPv6 UDP TCP Callback Unix IPv6Base SocketBase TCPBase UDPBase UDPIPv4Base IPv4Base. Same configure command. /MF ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
