On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Wes Hardaker <harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:43:56 -0500, Robert Story <rst...@freesnmp.com> >>>>>> said: > > BF> (I've already diffed agent/mibgroup/agentx between 5.5 and 5.6, it's > BF> almost all cleanups that can't explain this; there's something more > BF> subtle going on somewhere.) > > RS> Have you diffed the transport code too? > > Um... that's probably close to impossible. Remember that the transport > system had some huge changes to it. Though none of the changes should > have affected the agentx implementation it's always possible it did. > But lots of code was moved from one file to another, for example.
Yeah, rather than focusing on "what changed", I decided to improve the debugging, nfs-mount a big disk for the log file, and log like mad. I found one clear bug, which was already reported in the bugs tracker: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3126823&group_id=12694&atid=112694 and my patch is at: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3141462&group_id=12694&atid=312694 There are more bugs here; possibly similar to https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3107079&group_id=12694&atid=112694 -- in my hammer-on-the-agent test I do sometimes see genError, but haven't narrowed this one down yet. Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forrester recently released a report on the Return on Investment (ROI) of Google Apps. They found a 300% ROI, 38%-56% cost savings, and break-even within 7 months. Over 3 million businesses have gone Google with Google Apps: an online email calendar, and document program that's accessible from your browser. Read the Forrester report: http://p.sf.net/sfu/googleapps-sfnew _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
