> -----Original Message-----
> From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com 
> [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Dave Shield
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 1:44 PM
> To: Lewis Adam-VNQM87
> Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: Trap retries
> 
> On 24 March 2011 13:20, Lewis Adam-VNQM87 
> <vnq...@motorolasolutions.com> wrote:
> >  that's what I thought and yet ... that's what we're seeing.
> > It may be something lower down in our protocol stack.
> 
> The other thought that springs to mind is if the 'send' fails
> (because the interface is already down).   Maybe that then
> schedules a retransmission?
> 
> You could test this by increasing the timeout and/or retry 
> count, and see whether this affects the length of "short downtime"
> that still results in a stale trap being received.
> 
What are you suggesting that schedules the retransmission? The net-snmp code 
detecting the trap send fail or the lower level protocol stack detecting the 
udp pdu send fail?

Adam.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software 
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker 
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to