>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2011 15:09:43 +0100, Dave Shield >>>>> <d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk> said:
DS> Next question: should 5.6.1.1 contain *just* this reversion DS> or should it contain other changes on the 5.6.x branch? If it's not just that one, then it'd be 5.6.2. >> (and fedora patched immediately for updates). DS> That's really a decision for the Fedora packagers, not us. Yes, but we know them :-P -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
