On 05/13/2011 07:54 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Niels Baggesen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:35:12AM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: >>> WH> A) produce 5.6.1.1 immediately >>> >>> I think that needs to be done (and fedora patched immediately for updates). >> >> I think I said it earlier, but now that it is formally a CFV: +1 (at least) > > If the Fedora people can get 5.6.1.1 included in Fedora 15, a +1 from me too.
I am the one who decides for Fedora and it's a bit too late, final RC is being composed right now and this is not important enough to stop whole Fedora. Of course, I can release 0-day update, still we will have bad net-snmp-libs.rpm on .iso images and I'd like to avoid breaking API/ABI after release. So, my proposal: For Net-SNMP, +1 to release 5.6.1.1 with u_long, 5.7 with int32 and big release note (and soname bump). For Fedora, keep int32 as it is now, with Fedora specific patches if necessary. No soname bumps in stable releases :(. Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
