On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Steve Friedl <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Martin Knappe wrote:
> > I have a very general question for a start. It seems to me that IPv6
> > connectivity is not currently supported by net-snmp, is that correct?
> > I was not able to:
> >
> > 1) set up the snmp-agent to listen on v6-addresses and respond to
> requests
> >
> > 2) send snmp traps with snmptrap or from within my own code with the C
> API
> >
> > Please, can someone confirm my observations or correct me if I'm wrong?
>
> You didn't show how you tried to do it, but it's certainly supported via
> snmpd. "man snmpd" shows that you can provide the listening address as:
>
> udp6:10161 listen on port 10161 on all IPv6 interfaces.
>
> I presume traps work likewise with ipv6.
>
> Steve
>
Yes I've seen that manpage, but I believe it's broken. I've tried that
command line option.
Theres also an option called agentaddress to be included in the snmpd config
file
which can supposedly be used to specify IPv6 addresses. I've tried all of
that and to me it seems IPv6 support is broken.
Is there anyone who's actually got it to work?
>
> --
> Stephen J Friedl | Security Consultant | UNIX Wizard | 714 694-0494
> [email protected] | Orange County, CA | Microsoft MVP | unixwiz.net
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
