Thanks a lot Dave for clarification.
With regards,
Biswajit
> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:55:00 +0000
> Subject: Re: Reg: RMON MIB : Object eventOwner
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
>
> On 29 January 2012 07:09, Biswajit Mandal <[email protected]> wrote:
> > As per the RFC, the description of the object eventOwner
>
> [snip]
>
> > Does it mean if the configured owner string does not start with keyword
> > monitor, then the management stations should not be able to poll any entry
> > in correcponding logTable?
>
> No - I don't think that's a valid assumption.
>
> As I read it, this description is saying that if the event has been set
> up by a "monitor" type owner, then this is a hint to management
> stations that there will probably be some more information recorded
> in the log table. Hence it would be a good idea to query this table.
>
> If the event has been set up by some other owner, then there may
> or may not be more information in the log table, and it's up to the
> management station as to whether it checks or not.
>
>
> > What this object is saying, as far in deployment, how this object is really
> > used?
>
> Pass.
> As far as I understand things, the event-related aspects of the RMON
> MIB (which are specific to the monitoring functions defined within that MIB),
> have essentially been superceded by the DisMan Event MIB (which provides
> a more general version of the same basic functionality)
>
> Dave
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
