On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:53:39PM -0400, Robert Story wrote: > NB> #include <net-snmp/data_access/swrun.h> > NB> #include "hrSWRunPerfTable.h" > NB> +#include "data_access/swrun.h" > > My question is why isn't #include <net-snmp/data_access/swrun.h> picking up > swrun.h? Do we really need both includes?
They way the contents is organized, yes. But I didn't write that code. The culprit is the declaration netsnmp_container *netsnmp_swrun_container(void); which is in data_access/swrun.h. The other solution is to move the two function declaration that exist in that header to the one in the include directory. This patch is just backporting what was done in 5.6, so it is the safe solution. /Niels -- Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - n...@users.sourceforge.net The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers --- R W Hamming ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
