On Tue, 15 May 2012 08:57:53 +0200 Niels wrote: NB> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:53:39PM -0400, Robert Story wrote: NB> > NB> #include <net-snmp/data_access/swrun.h> NB> > NB> #include "hrSWRunPerfTable.h" NB> > NB> +#include "data_access/swrun.h" NB> > NB> > My question is why isn't #include <net-snmp/data_access/swrun.h> picking NB> > up swrun.h? Do we really need both includes? NB> NB> They way the contents is organized, yes. But I didn't write that NB> code.
Ah, so there is a public and a private swrun.h. NB> This patch is just backporting what was done in 5.6, so it is the NB> safe solution. Ok. +1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
