On 5 August 2012 11:41, Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org> wrote: > --- a/agent/mibgroup/utilities/execute.h > +++ b/agent/mibgroup/utilities/execute.h > @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ > config_belongs_in(agent_module) > > int run_shell_command(char *command, char *input, > - char *output, size_t *out_len); > + char *output, int *out_len); > int run_exec_command( char *command, char *input, > - char *output, size_t *out_len); > + char *output, int *out_len);
Doesn't this introduce a change in the API ? As such, shouldn't it require a new name for these routines? (perhaps with the old API retained as a compatability wrapper) Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders