On 5 August 2012 11:41, Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org> wrote:
> --- a/agent/mibgroup/utilities/execute.h
> +++ b/agent/mibgroup/utilities/execute.h
> @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
>  config_belongs_in(agent_module)
>
>  int run_shell_command(char *command, char *input,
> -                      char *output,  size_t  *out_len);
> +                      char *output,  int  *out_len);
>  int run_exec_command( char *command, char *input,
> -                      char *output,  size_t  *out_len);
> +                      char *output,  int  *out_len);


Doesn't this introduce a change in the API ?
As such, shouldn't it require a new name for these routines?
(perhaps with the old API retained as a compatability wrapper)

Dave

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to