On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 19:36:20 -0800 Bart wrote:
BVA> On 02/05/16 17:35, Robert Drake wrote:
BVA> > The perl guys apparently added a definition for U64 which
BVA> > conflicts with the one in int64.h. Is it possible to add
BVA> > #ifdef guards to one definition or the other, or if one is
BVA> > used in a limited scope can the name be changed?  
BVA> 
BVA> The U64 typedef has been removed from
BVA> include/net-snmp/library/int64.h. Can you verify whether this
BVA> fixes the build issue ?

Bart,

I think this needs some discussion. While the change does not
affect binary compatibility, it does remove a typedef that has been
around since 1998. It's possible and even likely that people are
using this typedef in their own modules, and this will break
backwards compatibility for them.

Robert

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to