Hi Bill, yes, you are right. I didn't look for solution at Patches page on sourceforge. My fault. It's really easy to overlook it for newbie. I will be more careful next time.
I have attached it to one of related bug report [1]. Anyway, my patch will be replaced by upstream approved version. Josef [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2757/ ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Bill Fenner" <fen...@gmail.com> | To: "Josef Ridky" <jri...@redhat.com> | Cc: "Bart Van Assche" <bvanass...@acm.org>, "Net-SNMP Coders" <net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net> | Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 1:43:37 PM | Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 support? | | On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 4:34 AM, Josef Ridky <jri...@redhat.com> wrote: | | > These changes has been delivered to upstream, unfortunately, nobody has | > response on them yet and I do not have commit access to official net-snmp | > repository. | > | | When you say "nobody has response on them yet", are you talking about | https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/patches/1336/ (on which many have | responsed, including the fact that the patches were committed)? If not, | can you say what mechanism was used to deliver the patches to upstream? | | Thanks, | Bill | | | > | > From my point of view, I have done all that I could. | > | > Josef Ridky | > Associate Software Engineer | > Core Services Team | > Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. | > | > ----- Original Message ----- | > | From: "Bart Van Assche" <bvanass...@acm.org> | > | To: "Josef Ridky" <jri...@redhat.com>, "Jörg Westheide" < | > joerg.westhe...@sparkpost.com> | > | Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net | > | Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 10:14:22 AM | > | Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 support? | > | | > | On 10/27/17 08:14, Josef Ridky wrote: | > | > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/net-snmp/c/ | > e4d5ceb957a64d6994629f84901d9f76d2ffed9b?branch=master | > | | > | A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. | > | Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? | > | A: Top-posting. | > | Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? | > | | > | Regarding the contents of your message: I have not looked at the code | > | your URL points at. But I think there are two possibilities: | > | 1. Either the Fedora Net-SNMP repository is identical to the current or | > | a previous version of the official Net-SNMP repository. | > | 2. Or the Fedora Net-SNMP repository contains patches that are not in | > | the upstream Net-SNMP repository. | > | | > | In case (1) you should have pointed at the official Net-SNMP repository | > | instead of the Fedora repository. Regarding (2): is the policy of Red | > | Hat still to send patches upstream first because integrating these into | > | a Red Hat repository | > | (https://opensource.com/article/16/12/why-red-hat- | > takes-upstream-first-approach)? | > | If so, have the people who are contributing to the Fedora Net-SNMP | > | repository tried to submit their patches to the official Net-SNMP | > project? | > | | > | Bart. | > | | > | > ------------------------------------------------------------ | > ------------------ | > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most | > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot | > _______________________________________________ | > Net-snmp-coders mailing list | > Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net | > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders | > | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
