On Fri, 4 May 2018 11:40:21 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> I apologize for mis-speaking.  I meant, session.localname,
BF> which is used in _sess_open() as follows:
BF> 
BF> 
https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/ci/master/tree/snmplib/snmp_api.c#l1629

Ok, thanks for the pointer. So right now the only use of localname
appears to be from netsnmp_create_v1v2_notification_session().

BF> I've been using and testing this code in EOS for 3 years, so
BF> it's not that it's a brand new idea asking to get into rc1.
BF> There could be better timing, sure, but this all unraveled from
BF> me doing a better job of looking at Arista's test results
BF> because rc1 is coming up, and finding that clientaddr is just
BF> broken.

Ok, I was wondering how long you'd had the patch and how often it
was exercised. Seems like it's regular use, which is in your favor.

BF> 5.8 introduces the ability to do this with
BF> "trap*sink" (although as mentioned in the other thread, it
BF> seems to be broken).  But it's not possible to configure SNMPv3
BF> trap sinks with the "trap*sink" commands, so EOS configures all
BF> of its trap destinations with "trapsess".
BF> 
BF> If this is too esoteric, and it's not desirable to give
BF> "trapsess" feature parity with "trap*sink", I can keep this
BF> patch local to Arista. Or maybe since it's "feature parity" and
BF> not "new feature" it can go into 5.8.1.  Or I can hold onto it
BF> for 5.9.

I think feature parity is a good thing. How close are you to having
this patch ready? I'd say create a branch for it and push it to teh
SF or github repo. Seeing the actual patch will help me form my
opinion on rc1 (maybe if you're quick), 5.8.1 (seams reasonable,
but does it change any existing ABI?), or 5.9.

Robert

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to