Hi Madhusudhana,

Did you go back and confirm Wes' theory? Did you see an authPriv
request which failed, followed by and auth request that succeeded?

Robert


On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 04:19:28 +0000 Madhusudhana wrote:
MR> Thanks Wes. 
MR> 
MR> -----Original Message-----
MR> From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:harda...@users.sourceforge.net] 
MR> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2019 10:08 PM
MR> 
MR> Madhusudhana R <madhusudhan...@in.abb.com> writes:
MR> 
MR> > Can you please let me know whether this feature is added
MR> > newly in v5.8 or it was an existing feature in v5.7.3 ?
MR> > If it is a new feature in v5.8, is there a way to toggle some
MR> > MACRO value to make sure an user with authpriv protocol will
MR> > always responds in encrypted way?  
MR> 
MR> It's not new at all; that behavior has been around since the
MR> creation of the SNMPv3 code within Net-SNMP (which at the time
MR> was called UCD-SNMP, showing how old this concept is).  At the
MR> time, encryption wasn't even possible for everyone deploying
MR> the code (and the only encryption supported was DES).  The
MR> world tended to also believe that authentication (ensuring
MR> packets weren't modified) was a "must have" but encryption was
MR> merely a "would be nice if you could, but it's not critical".


_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to