Hi Madhusudhana, Did you go back and confirm Wes' theory? Did you see an authPriv request which failed, followed by and auth request that succeeded?
Robert On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 04:19:28 +0000 Madhusudhana wrote: MR> Thanks Wes. MR> MR> -----Original Message----- MR> From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:harda...@users.sourceforge.net] MR> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2019 10:08 PM MR> MR> Madhusudhana R <madhusudhan...@in.abb.com> writes: MR> MR> > Can you please let me know whether this feature is added MR> > newly in v5.8 or it was an existing feature in v5.7.3 ? MR> > If it is a new feature in v5.8, is there a way to toggle some MR> > MACRO value to make sure an user with authpriv protocol will MR> > always responds in encrypted way? MR> MR> It's not new at all; that behavior has been around since the MR> creation of the SNMPv3 code within Net-SNMP (which at the time MR> was called UCD-SNMP, showing how old this concept is). At the MR> time, encryption wasn't even possible for everyone deploying MR> the code (and the only encryption supported was DES). The MR> world tended to also believe that authentication (ensuring MR> packets weren't modified) was a "must have" but encryption was MR> merely a "would be nice if you could, but it's not critical". _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders