On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:20:01 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> > Hmmm, it seems that mib2c is very naughty and silently ignores options DS> > that it does not understand, which includes -M DS> DS> It looks as if the main CVS branch has rather more robust argument DS> parsing code, which *does* report on unrecognised options. DS> Is it worth applying this approach to the 5.1.2 code as well, DS> or would this count as a "new feature" ?
Sounds like a bug to me... -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: GNOME Foundation Hackers Unite! GUADEC: The world's #1 Open Source Desktop Event. GNOME Users and Developers European Conference, 28-30th June in Norway http://2004/guadec.org _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
