Dave> It looks as if the main CVS branch has rather more robust argument Dave> parsing code, which *does* report on unrecognised options. Dave> Is it worth applying this approach to the 5.1.2 code as well, Dave> or would this count as a "new feature" ? Wes> Though I agree it's a bug, its on the border...
Two votes for a bug - that's good enough for me. <tap, tap, tap, tap, TAP> OK - now fixed. Wes> Note that I think the Wes> new 5.2 version will have some new options too (though my memory may Wes> be wrong), so be careful if you're going to back-port. Oh ye of little faith, Wes! Did you *really* think that I'd just blindly apply a main-line diff to a previous branch? Surely you know me better than that by now? I don't trust computers, remember.... Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
