On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 16:07:05 -0400 Robert wrote: RW> Thanks for your quick response. We're going live with our implementation, RW> so please excuse me if it takes a couple of days to get you those traces.
Ok, no problem. RW> I think I'll heed the warning that AgentX isn't ready for prime-time and RW> move to integrating our MIB support directly into snmpd. Note that AgentX support is much improved in 5.1.1 and beyond. In fact, I think we've removed all the warnings for 5.2. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
