>>>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:02:04 -0700 (PDT), C Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
C> There shouldn't be a difference between (in theory) C> how interfaces are enumerated by an snmpwalk and how C> open-nms does, however open-nms may be performing some C> specific snmpgets as a result of the output from the C> emuneration walk. Have you experimented with some C> random snmp gets, especially on invalid interfaces ? The difference is probably in how they collect data. It's possible they're using getbulk requests instead of getnext, like snmpwalk uses. However, net-policy also uses getbulk requests and I've been monitoring interfaces with it for a long time without problem. The thing to do is to run snmpd under a debugger and when it hangs hit ctrl-c and see what it's currently doing (under gdb, you'd type "where" to figure this out). -- Wes Hardaker Sparta ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
