On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:44:47 +0200 Thomaschewski, wrote: TH> Thanks for your help. Now I understood the different between TH> both but what happens, when both options are standing in the TH> snmpd.conf? TH> TH> Is "com2sec" able to forbidd access when "rocommunity" allows it?
Maybe, but not in any officially supported way. If you have non-trivial access control requirements, then you should be using com2sec and friends. You should not use both methods for the same community string. Unofficially, if you walk the vacm tables, you'll see that the rocommunity token is just a wrapper that creates com2sec and other entries for you. So if you figure out the naming scheme, you could add entries to modify a rocommunity default setup. Note that the naming scheme is subject to change in future releases, and adding/removing rocommunity entries in snmpd.conf will likely break any such custom config. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
