On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 06:13:29PM -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> Well, it would have helped if I had attached the patch, eh? No worries, I'm
> certain as to what the results would be, so I've got a fix to test instead...
> Let me know if this helps.
Most peculiar..
With both patches (set-var-value.pat and int64-overflow.pat) it didn't
work, and when using -DALL the daemon crashed (segfault) once it gets a request
from a client.
So I recompiled a fresh tarball with *only* the int64-overflow.pat
installed and that does fix it! (for me at least :)
See:
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.1 = Counter32: 59608851
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.2 = Counter32: 4017170158
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.3 = Counter32: 231982920
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.4 = Counter32: 0
And next sample:
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.1 = Counter32: 59609203
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.2 = Counter32: 43495081
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.3 = Counter32: 231997236
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.4 = Counter32: 0
Perfect roll-over seen by the 32 bit client!
So probably a small bug (oops, sorry.. feature :) has crept into the
set-var-value.pat especially combined with the int64-overflow.pat
Still.. It's looking good from this end :)
Bye, Arno.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
