> On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 07:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I thought ..... that on shutdown the agent > > tells the subagent to save its persistent values. > > Hmmm... that's an idea, I suppose. > In general, the administration side of the AgentX protocol > is very much driven by the subagent - the master agent just > listens for incoming registrations. > > But the master agent *does* explicitly close any AgentX > connections when it shuts down. I suppose that could > potentially trigger saving the configuration.
I think it does. It's been a while since I worked on that code but I don't think _I'm_ doing anything to trigger that save. Maybe I am... > ... > > Well, I was asking if the subagent code set up a signal handler for > > SIGHUP. I guess I see now that that's unlikely. > > Not necessarily. > If you're using the main Net-SNMP agent in a subagent role, > then that will inherit the same behaviour as the master agent, > so *would* include the usual SIGHUP handling. > I haven't looked at the stripped-down subagent framework, > to see whether that does or not. But it wouldn't be too > difficult to add if necessary. > > And if the subagent is mostly code you've written yourself, then > it'd depend on whether you coded SIGHUP handling or not :-) :-) Yes, my subagent is mostly my code, a 3-thread program with the subagent in one thread. > > > Suck it and see. > > > > Huh? > > Sorry - must be a British expression. > ... I guessed that might be the case from your .uk address. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users