On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 10:59 -0500, Kyle Tucker wrote:
> > Can you try the following patch, and see if it helps.
> >
> > --- agent_registry.c.cln 2006-02-15 13:25:22.603744208 +0000
> > +++ agent_registry.c 2006-02-15 13:27:11.136244760 +0000
> > @@ -587,7 +587,8 @@
> > DEBUGMSGTL(("register_mib", "registering \"%s\" at ", moduleName));
> > DEBUGMSGOIDRANGE(("register_mib", mibloc, mibloclen, range_subid,
> > range_ubound));
> > - DEBUGMSG(("register_mib", " with context \"%s\"\n", context));
> > + DEBUGMSG(("register_mib", " with context \"%s\"\n",
> > + (context ? context : "(null)")));
>
> It would seem that code is already in there.
Nope.
I've just checked a clean 5.2.2 tarball, and it blindly prints the
value of the context string, with no checks. I've also checked the
CVS archive, and there's no mention of this check (or anything similar)
there either.
I don't know what's happened to your code, unless you've inadvertently
applied the patch twice?
Check that the agent_registry.c file *does* include this test, and
then re-compile. What happens?
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
