I don't really understand what you want me to do... What I can propose is to give you ( freely, of course ;o) ): - a sample test and a sample MIB for tables shared between multiple subagents - my "evolution" of the code registering the table so that it can manage the whole table registration and the columns registration
About the modification of the code, as I previously say, I want to modify the registration of the table, so that the rootoid_len is set to the correct value in the two situations (whole table registration and columns of the table registration). For me, this has to be done at the end of the registration process. (but I have to test it...) In the archived mails, I've seen a lot of people trying to implement a table shared by multiple subagents unsuccesfully. (I don't know if they solve the problem, but if they do, they don't share their knowledge). My purpose is to contribute to this project and not keep my modifications for me. Tell me what you think about this. Arnaud. >From: "Dave Shield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Arnaud BODENAN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: multiple Sub-agents managing the same table >Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:02:50 +0100 > >On 08/09/06, Arnaud BODENAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> nothing exists in the library >>net-snmp to >>manage get/get_next requests for tables registered with range_subid >>and range_ubound > >There is no existing helper to assist with implementing a single row >of a table - correct. As I said some time ago, this is very much >uncharted territory. But the agent framework *can* handle this - >given suitable MIB-specific code. (Which you would have to write >yourself). > >> by the way, this is a bug, no? > >No - it's not a bug. It's an unimplemented feature. > > >>To my point of view, the helper functions must be able to manage these >>two possibilities , and this is not the case. > >Agreed - It would be very useful to have a helper (or at least a mib2c >config) that would handle implementing a single row of a table. > But as with so much of this agent - if the current code doesn't do >what you want, the onus is on the person with a particular requirement >to either do the work themselves, or fund someone to do it for them. >Such is the downside of OpenSource projects... > >Of course, we could always give you your money back :-) > >Dave _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users