On 04/01/2008, McGowen, Wendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Our MIB's are still in definition, and since I'm very new > to this side of SNMP, any advice on MIB syntax is greatly appreciated!
The first thing to do would be to run them through 'smilint' (or similar) to validate the syntax. Our MIB parsing tools are fairly easy-going, and will accept not-quite-valid MIBs. smilint is extremely picky, and will report on all sorts of errors and inconsistencies. Best to get these dealt with before you go live. Once your MIBs pass this sort of check, you might want to consider posting them here (assuming they're not commercially sensitive!), so we can comment on any design decisions that you might come to regret later. It's difficult to make sensible comments about MIB fragments, taken in isolation. It's much easier when you've got the whole thing to look at, and can get a better feel for the overall structure. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
