I've implemented the first round of our SNMP agents - we'll be
supporting get's only, along with traps; no set's will be supported for
the first release.
We'll be allowing the user to configure the SNMP security through our UI
(which does NOT use SNMP), so we're hoping to keep it as simple as
possible. I've been testing with what I guess is called "v2" security -
where you have to list IP addresses of clients, put them in groups with
specific access, etc. (I haven't even attempted the "v3" stuff yet). But
management is wondering if we could make it even simpler for the
customer, and step back to "v1", which I guess is nothing more than a
community string and either "read" or "read/write" access.
So my question is, is it "okay" to use the simplest security model (and
the least secure) if you're going to have view only data? Or are most
SNMP customers going to want a more secure model? Again, we aren't ready
to move to the latest and greatest yet (we want to have a better feel
for SNMP in general before we go down that path), so at best it would be
the "v2" stuff.
Thanks!
~ Wendy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
