> I'm not sure what unsolved problem you refer to, but the chief reason for > putting the augmented index first is to allow a walk of > [table].[augmented index] to return all the rows which match the > augmented row.
Understood. Thank you. > If you really are doing a table of DHCP ranges, are you sure you need to > augment each interface with a table of values? It seems to me that a > DHCP server would only have one range to serve, an thus the second index > would be moot. I think the reason for multiple ranges is to exclude some range of IP addresses under the same subnet. You are right. Normally the IP addresses are included a consecutive range and the range table is therefore unnecessary. /Pan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
