> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Xuan Pan
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 1:48 AM
> Since I still have the problem in my last post unsolved, I
> don't really
> understand why the order of indexes matters.
I'm not sure what unsolved problem you refer to, but the chief reason
for putting the augmented index first is to allow a walk of [table].[augmented
index] to return all the rows which match the augmented row.
If you really are doing a table of DHCP ranges, are you sure you need
to augment each interface with a table of values? It seems to me that a DHCP
server would only have one range to serve, an thus the second index would be
moot.
HTH,
Mike
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
