Hello, i mean issuing a series of individual GET requests for entries within a single table with 1 row and 8 presented columns.
I get differen results between series of individual GET requests for entries within a single table and single GET requests on same entries within the table. When I send the following snmpget -c public 192.168.10.146 inspektor.3.3.1.1.0x8801 inspektor.3.3.1.2.0x8801 inspektor.3.3.1.3.0x8801 inspektor.3.3.1.4.0x8801 inspektor.3.3.1.5.0x8801 inspektor.3.3.1.6.0x8801 inspektor.3.3.1.7.0x8801 inspektor.3.3.1.8.0x8801 I receive the following. INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::1.34817 = STRING: "Module 1" INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::2.34817 = INTEGER: 136 INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::3.34817 = No Such Instance currently exists at this OID INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::4.34817 = No Such Instance currently exists at this OID INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::5.34817 = INTEGER: 0 INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::6.34817 = Timeticks: (0) 0:00:00.00 INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::7.34817 = No Such Instance currently exists at this OID INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::8.34817 = INTEGER: 1 Column 1 presents the value of column 7 and the values of column 3, 4 and 7 should present a specific string. If i add a additional GET request inspektor.3.3.1.9.0x8801 to the series, snmpd crash with segmentation fault. Column 9 does not provided by the table. When I enter the command with individual oid requests the values return correctly. snmpget -c public 192.168.10.146 inspektor.3.3.1.1.0x8801 INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::1.34817 = STRING: "v1.36" snmpget -c public 192.168.10.146 inspektor.3.3.1.2.0x8801 INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::2.34817 = INTEGER: 136 snmpget -c public 192.168.10.146 inspektor.3.3.1.3.0x8801 INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::3.34817 = STRING: "Description Module DP" snmpget -c public 192.168.10.146 inspektor.3.3.1.4.0x8801 INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::4.34817 = STRING: "88" snmpget -c public 192.168.10.146 inspektor.3.3.1.5.0x8801 INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::5.34817 = INTEGER: 0 snmpget -c public 192.168.10.146 inspektor.3.3.1.6.0x8801 INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::6.34817 = Timeticks: (0) 0:00:00.00 snmpget -c public 192.168.10.146 inspektor.3.3.1.7.0x8801 INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::7.34817 = STRING: "Module 1" snmpget -c public 192.168.10.146 inspektor.3.3.1.8.0x8801 INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::8.34817 = INTEGER: 1 snmpget -c public 192.168.10.146 inspektor.3.3.1.9.0x8801 INDUSOL-MODULAR-INSPEKTOR-MIB::moduleParamEntry.9.34817 = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID Norman > On 16 March 2011 12:13, <normanrae...@gmx.de> wrote: > > i have some problems with multiple snmpget requests on a table. > > What exactly do you mean by "multiple snmpget requests"? > > Do you mean issuing a series of individual GET requests > for entries within a single table? > Or issuing a single GET requests listing multiple instances > within a single table? > Or either of these covering instances from more than one table? > Or something else? > > > > Is it possible to do multible snmpget requests on tables? > > Yes > (To all of the above) > > What sort of problems are you seeing? > > Dave > -- NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
