On 16 March 2011 15:03, <normanrae...@gmx.de> wrote: > i mean issuing a series of individual GET requests > for entries within a single table with 1 row and 8 presented columns.
OK. > I get differen results between series of individual GET requests > for entries within a single table and single GET requests on same entries > within the table. Hmmm... that definitely sounds wrong. > When I send the following > snmpget -c public 192.168.10.146 inspektor.3.3.1.1.0x8801 > inspektor.3.3.1.2.0x8801 > inspektor.3.3.1.3.0x8801 inspektor.3.3.1.4.0x8801 > inspektor.3.3.1.5.0x8801 > inspektor.3.3.1.6.0x8801 inspektor.3.3.1.7.0x8801 > inspektor.3.3.1.8.0x8801 [snip] I presume this is a module that you have implemented yourself. Do you get similar problems with other tables (e.g. those that are part of the standard agent). If the problem is confined to this one table, then I'd suspect that it's a bug in the code that implements this particular table. We'd really have to see this code in order to make any suggestions. If it's a more widespread problem, then that would be more worrying. Which version of the agent are you using? Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
