On 8 July 2011 19:28, Chris Bartram <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there something I'm missing to get snmpwalk results to process the same
> mibs as snmptrapd does?
One thing to check is whether snmpwalk is reading MIB files from the
same location as snmptrapd. If you re-instate the syntax error in the
MIB file (*without* restarting snmpd/snmptrapd) and run the snmpwalk
command again. Do you get the same complaint from snmpwalk?
If not, then try explicitly loading the FOUNDRY-SN-ROOT-MIB within
the snmpwalk command:
snmpwalk -m +FOUNDRY-SN-ROOT-MIB ....
That _shouldn't_ be necessary if you're loading all of the mibs
using "mibs all", but it's worth checking.
The only other thing that I can think of would be to tweak
the MIB to import enterprises from SNMPv2-SMI rather than
RFC1155-SMI. That wouldn't strictly be valid, but the Net-SNMP
parsing library shouldn't worry about that.
Dave
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
