any ideas on this issue?

is TimeInterval defined as 0.1 seconds or seconds?

is snmpTargetAddrTimeout implemented correctly?

regards
Martin Perzl



Von:    martin.pe...@rohde-schwarz.com
An:     net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net, 
Datum:  04.07.2013 15:00
Betreff:        SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout interpreted 
incorrectly



I have set up an inform-sink with SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout 
set to 1000 (which is the default value in net-SNMP) 
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout is of type TimeInterval, which is 
defined as a period of time measured in 0.01 seconds (see 
http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/docs/mibs/snmpTargetMIB.html#TimeInterval 
for details) 

I am assuming, that informs will be re-sent (if not acknowledged) every 10 
seconds (1000*0.01 seconds = 10 seconds) 

But in fact, the retry interval, which I observed was 1 second (instead of 
the expected 10 seconds) 

I think this is a bug. Am I misunderstanding something? 


Regards 
Martin Perzl 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to