Maybe tick of the kernel is changed. normally it is 100. From your
description, maybe it is 1000.
Would you like to tell me the kernel of your computer?
On 07/12/2013 03:37 PM, martin.pe...@rohde-schwarz.com wrote:
that is what the definition says: measured in units of 0.01 seconds
in my case, I have set SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout, which
is of type TimeInterval to 1000
1000 * 0.01 = 10 , so the timeout should be 10 seconds
but in fact, informs are re-sent every 1 second instead of 10 seconds
can you verify that behavior?
regards
Martin
Von: zhuyj <zyjzyj2...@gmail.com>
An: martin.pe...@rohde-schwarz.com,
Kopie: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net, zhuyj <zyjzyj2...@gmail.com>
Datum: 12.07.2013 09:31
Betreff: Re: SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout interpreted
incorrectly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TimeInterval TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A period of time, measured in units of 0.01
seconds."
::= INTEGER (0..2147483647)
maybe 10 * 0.01 = 0.1 ?
On 07/12/2013 03:06 PM, _Martin.Perzl@rohde-schwarz.com_
<mailto:martin.pe...@rohde-schwarz.com>wrote:
any ideas on this issue?
is TimeInterval defined as 0.1 seconds or seconds?
is snmpTargetAddrTimeout implemented correctly?
regards
Martin Perzl
Von: _Martin.Perzl@rohde-schwarz.com_
<mailto:martin.pe...@rohde-schwarz.com>
An: _net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net_
<mailto:net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Datum: 04.07.2013 15:00
Betreff: SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout interpreted incorrectly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have set up an inform-sink with
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout set to 1000 (which is the
default value in net-SNMP)
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrTimeout is of type TimeInterval, which
is defined as a period of time measured in 0.01 seconds (see
_http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/docs/mibs/snmpTargetMIB.html#TimeInterval_for
details)
I am assuming, that informs will be re-sent (if not acknowledged)
every 10 seconds (1000*0.01 seconds = 10 seconds)
But in fact, the retry interval, which I observed was 1 second
(instead of the expected 10 seconds)
I think this is a bug. Am I misunderstanding something?
Regards
Martin
Perzl------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
_
__http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev________________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list_
__Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net_
<mailto:Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:_
__https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users_
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
_http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
_Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net_
<mailto:Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
_https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users_
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
